DexProof recorded y=bˣ as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1533 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 3 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 95.0% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 0.3%. Liquidity pools hold 99.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into. 33.8% of the token supply was bought for 0.7000 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
A price check for buying and then selling this token came back broken or heavily taxed.
Buying 0.01 ETH of the token and selling it straight back returned 0.004457116719152749 ETH (44.6%), on the pool with a 1% fee.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This deployer is a new wallet funded by another new wallet, a common setup before a rug.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 95 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood