DexProof recorded WIZARD as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1164 published 26 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 2 warned, 1 failed and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 84.8% of the circulating float.
Scanned 4d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000003
Liquidity
$3,122
Volume 24h
$0.2900
FDV
$3,238
Buys 24h
0
2 sells
Age
71d 22h
Top 10 holders hold 84.8% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 16.6%, because 80.3% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 59.5% of the float on its own.
On that scan, 5 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Deepest pool is valued at $3,122, but only $523 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Only the creator's most recent transactions were read.
449 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity were not checked. A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Could not read this pool's liquidity events, so custody was not attributed.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 99.9% of the liquidity this scan could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Launched on Liquidity Launcher V3.
We do not track that launchpad's raises yet, so how much of the raise the creator bought was not measured. 10.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.1000 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Buy and sell both simulate cleanly, including as two independent fresh wallets paying this chain's live gas price (40068000 wei).
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
24h turnover 0.0× liquidity.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Pool is 1618h old.
Contract deployed 1618h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Pool too shallow ($3122) for turnover analysis to be meaningful.
Robinhood