Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILLP custody
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNHoneypot
DexProof recorded WALL as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1483 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 2 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0007
Liquidity
$290,959
Volume 24h
$8,986
FDV
$1.23M
Buys 24h
56
25 sells
Age
—
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
This scan could not read the pool's liquidity history yet, so we are keeping it until we can. None of this CL pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 99.9% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. The liquidity sits in a locker whose owner can take it back. Our review of this locker found a recovery function that only its owner can call. This pool is on Up CL and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Top 10 holders hold 94% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 71.3% of the tokens in circulation for other holders we could not list. That share is not proven to be under one key. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 63.8%. Liquidity pools hold 31.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. Some of these tokens sit inside a staking or escrow contract, and we could only partly tell who deposited them. We report the highest share the evidence supports.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 107 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
Launched on Collection Token Deployer.
We don't track this launchpad's raises yet, so we don't know how much of the raise the creator bought.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
The deepest pool holds $290,959.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 4× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in the token contract's code.
It also has 3 functions whose names match a standard OpenZeppelin contract. Some of them can hand out permissions or move tokens on someone's behalf, for example burnFrom. We matched the names, not what the code behind them does.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 76 days old at this scan.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.