DexProof recorded USDG as CRITICAL on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1137 published 24 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 14 passed, 2 warned, 5 failed and 7 could not be run.
Don't trade this token.
Selling is blocked on this token's main pool and on every other pool large enough to matter.
Scanned 6d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0002
Liquidity
$179,930
Volume 24h
$159.06
FDV
$239,907
Buys 24h
1
4 sells
Age
8d 1h
Selling is blocked on this token's main pool and on every other pool large enough to matter.
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked.
The largest liquidity provider is , a plain wallet. It controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this.
Top 10 holders hold 99.7% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 24.9%, because 75.0% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 99.7% of the float on its own.
Deepest pool is valued at $179,930, but only $7 of that is ETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. That is effectively no exit liquidity.
Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: role admin, fee change, initialization, a switch that can block transfers or selling, limit change, amm route change.
On that scan, 5 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Pool is 38.3h old, under the 48h line.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
12 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity were not checked.
A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
No owner() function, but the contract audit could not attribute the contract's authority surface, so ownerlessness is not established.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
This token was deployed by a contract, but that deployer is not in the launchpad registry, so its provenance could not be attributed.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
Read at its implementation .
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
24h turnover 0.0× liquidity.
Trading profile is proportionate (0.0× turnover).
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Contract deployed 38h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Robinhood