DexProof recorded UP as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1534 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 4 warned and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000112
Liquidity
$9,420
Volume 24h
$34.04
FDV
$10,483
Buys 24h
1
2 sells
Age
50d 19h
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-09-14, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
Top 10 holders hold 46% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 7.3% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 19.8%. Liquidity pools hold 48.5% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. A further 8.2% of total supply is in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path. It can never re-enter circulation, so we leave it out of the tokens in circulation.
The deepest pool holds $9,420.
All of this depth arrived in the 24 hours before this scan.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Deployer pulled liquidity, Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't read the creator's transactions. We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity.
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan.
The missing data is small enough that it does not limit the verdict.
100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is locked in Launchpad V2 Launch Locker, a trusted locker contract.
The lock is permanent, so that liquidity can never be withdrawn. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.9% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there. That pool holds about $9,420 in total, so what this lock protects is small.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 49 days old at this scan.
This contract was 49 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
The creator bought 0% of the raise. We couldn't fully read the transaction that opened this token's pool, so we don't know who bought at launch.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood