DexProof recorded TROLL as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1460 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 4 warned and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This token crashed after launch.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000064
Liquidity
$5,988
Volume 24h
$41.99
FDV
$6,332
Buys 24h
26
178 sells
Age
82d 3h
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-09-28, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 48% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 11.8% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 13.0%. Liquidity pools hold 73.0% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool is valued at $5,988, but only $1,391 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 81 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 4 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched. 11.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.1700 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (42676000 wei).
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in the token contract's code.
It also has 21 functions we couldn't identify (0x0861ac61, 0x089fe6aa, 0x12f16a07, 0x3de35b79, and 17 more). You may want to look at them. The contract's own published source names every one of them.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a community takeover, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 80 days old at this scan.
This contract was 80 days old at this scan.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood