DexProof recorded TIBBIR as CRITICAL on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1292 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 13 passed, 7 warned, 5 failed and 3 could not be run.
Don't trade this token.
The deployer (), a plain wallet, controls 100.0% of the liquidity backing this V3 pool at the current price and can withdraw it at any moment.
Scanned 3d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0137
Liquidity
$2,408
Volume 24h
$1,666
FDV
$13.68M
Buys 24h
381
326 sells
Age
3d 16h
The deployer (), a plain wallet, controls 100.0% of the liquidity backing this V3 pool at the current price and can withdraw it at any moment.
Renouncing ownership does not protect against this.
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 99.1% of the tokens in circulation on its own. This token's balances add up to more than the supply it reports, so we can't state a share of total supply. Its pools and burn addresses alone hold 0.00 times that reported supply.
The deepest pool is valued at $2,408, but only $321 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. That leaves effectively nothing for sellers to cash out into. All of this depth arrived in the 24 hours before this scan.
This token's value at full supply is 5681× its pool liquidity, so the valuation is mostly paper.
The token contract has privileged powers: address block, a switch that can block transfers or selling, upgrade code.
Someone can still use them, or we couldn't tell who controls them.
We couldn't finish the sell test.
This token keeps its balances in a way our test can't handle, so we can't say whether it can be sold.
This deployer is a new wallet funded by another new wallet, a common setup before a rug.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The code can be changed, but we found no admin address for it.
That does not prove the power to change it is gone. Another upgrade route may still be live.
This token's code matches 0x8936…74a1, a token whose market later collapsed.
That describes the market, not who caused it. We haven't verified that the same creator is behind both.
This token's pool was only 7.9 hours old at this scan, under our 48 hour line.
This contract was only 7.9 hours old at this scan.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 937 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan.
The missing data is small enough that it does not limit the verdict.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This is about its implementation at .
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.7× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $2,408, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.
Robinhood