Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 58% of the tokens in circulation.
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILLiquidity depth
- FAILFDV vs liquidity ratio
DexProof recorded Spoderman as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1698 published 31 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 1 warned, 3 failed and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 58% of the tokens in circulation.
Price
$0.0000068
Liquidity
$13.60
Volume 24h
$0.5200
FDV
$6,805
Buys 24h
0
2 sells
Age
58d 18h
Top 10 holders hold 58% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 11.1% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 6.8%. Liquidity pools hold 88.3% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $14, effectively nothing.
This token's value at full supply is 500× its pool liquidity, so the valuation is mostly paper.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 32 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This pool's own hook holds 100.0% of its liquidity.
We counted that share, but it is not a wallet, a burn or a trusted locker, so we can't say who controls the rest. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.3% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
7 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out. A new wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes. A price quote alone can't test that.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in the token contract's code.
It also has 10 functions we couldn't identify (0x38841782, 0x4ddf9da0, 0x537f5312, 0x7e5b1e24, and 6 more). You may want to look at them. The contract's own published source names every one of them.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
We found no risky copycat link for this token's code.
This token's pool was 59 days old at this scan.
This contract was 59 days old at this scan.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $14, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.