DexProof recorded SHRP as DANGER on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1753 published 1 Nov 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 5 warned, 1 failed and 5 could not be run.
High risk. Only trade what you can afford to lose.
Trading looks like wash trading: volume is 17× the pool's liquidity, from only 482 traders.
Price
$0.0000681
Liquidity
$16,956
Volume 24h
$292,724
FDV
$68,123
Buys 24h
2,715
1,877 sells
Age
18h 28m
Trading looks like wash trading: volume is 17× the pool's liquidity, from only 482 traders.
Up to 11.2 trades per wallet on one side.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere.
Top 10 holders hold 32% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 6.2% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 25.3%. Liquidity pools hold 12.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. A further 8.2% of total supply is in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path. It can never re-enter circulation, so we leave it out of the tokens in circulation.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 17× the pool's liquidity.
This token's pool was only 16.3 hours old at this scan, under our 48 hour line.
This contract was only 16.3 hours old at this scan.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 128 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan.
The missing data is small enough that it does not limit the verdict.
100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is locked in Launchpad V2 Launch Locker, a trusted locker contract.
The lock is permanent, so that liquidity can never be withdrawn. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 95.1% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
The deepest pool holds $16,956.
All of this depth arrived in the 24 hours before this scan.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 4× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown. We couldn't fully read the transaction that opened this token's pool, so we don't know who bought at launch.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood