Don't trade this token.
Selling is blocked on this token's main pool and every other pool big enough to matter.
- FAILHoneypot
- FAILDeployer pulled liquidity
- FAILConfirmed rug
DexProof recorded sheet as CRITICAL on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1610 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 13 passed, 2 warned, 5 failed and 8 could not be run.
Don't trade this token.
Selling is blocked on this token's main pool and every other pool big enough to matter.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Selling is blocked on this token's main pool and every other pool big enough to matter.
This token's creator removed liquidity from this token's pool.
It made 1 withdrawal on Uniswap V2, and that withdrawal closed the position completely.
This token is on our list of confirmed rugs.
About $4,588 either left its pool or is stuck inside it.
We flagged this token as a honeypot on 2026-10-23.
That mark keeps its rating at DANGER or worse until it is lifted.
The token contract has privileged powers: fake Transfer events that show tokens coming from the wrong place.
Someone can still use them, or we couldn't tell who controls them.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
The largest LP holder, (a contract), holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity.
It is not the deployer. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its controller or contract code may still move or withdraw it. The contract needs an audit before we can say more. None of this pool's liquidity is burned or locked.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't tell who funded the creator's wallet.
The funding contract, or the wallet behind it, could not be identified, so its history is unknown.
We couldn't identify the contract that funded this deployer or who sent it, so we can't say which wallets are linked to them.
The contract has no owner function, but we can't confirm nobody controls it.
Our contract audit could not tell who holds control over it.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Top 10 holders hold 18% of the tokens in circulation.
Against total supply, the top 10 hold 6.5%. Liquidity pools hold 64.0% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 54 days old at this scan.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.