Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 86% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded SEMI as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1567 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 18 passed, 3 warned, 1 failed and 6 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 86% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0033
Liquidity
$481,632
Volume 24h
$633.98
FDV
$270,345
Buys 24h
0
7 sells
Age
77d 23h
Top 10 holders hold 86% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 61.5% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 8.7%. Liquidity pools hold 89.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
The token's main pool did not pass a sell test, so smaller pools that did pass can't show the token can be sold. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
The token contract has privileged powers, but none can still be used.
The code still contains these, but they can no longer be used: supply mint (setMinter can only run once and already has).
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 803 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
This pool's own hook holds 96.6% of its liquidity.
We counted that share, but it is not a wallet, a burn or a trusted locker, so we can't say who controls the rest. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
The contract has no owner function, but we can't confirm nobody controls it.
Our contract audit could not tell who holds control over it.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The deepest pool holds $481,632.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (an ad, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 77 days old at this scan.
This contract was 77 days old at this scan.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.