Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 99% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILLaunchpad provenance
- WARNPrior pump-and-dump mark
DexProof recorded ROBIN as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1453 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 2 warned, 2 failed and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 99% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 99% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 44.1% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 2.3%. Liquidity pools hold 97.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one. 91.8% of the token supply was bought for 9.9000 ETH by 92 wallets in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-09-26, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 29 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.9% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 29 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
2 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out. A new wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes. A price quote alone can't test that.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 32 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.