We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 13d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNLP custody
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-17 under an older formula (v1.60). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 13d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0006
Liquidity
$163,653
Volume 24h
$24,634
FDV
$599,896
Buys 24h
80
74 sells
Age
92d 5h
Sell execution could not be established on the other venues checked: At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so the token-wide result is unresolved.
Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
On that scan, 5 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked.
The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 99.6% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its controller or contract logic may still transfer or withdraw it; contract audit is required before making a stronger claim. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 98.1% of the liquidity this scan could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Only the creator's most recent transactions were read.
217 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity were not checked. A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Launched on UERC20 Token Factory.
We do not track that launchpad's raises yet, so how much of the raise the creator bought was not measured.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
Top 10 holders hold 21.9% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 18.4%, because 16.2% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Deepest pool holds $163,653.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode rather than proven against this one.
FDV is 4× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
The token contract has no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in its bytecode.
This contract also has 4 functions we could not identify (0x02d05d3f, 0x392f37e9, 0x3c130d90, 0xf56a499f). You may want to look at them. Every one of them is named in the contract's own published source.
24h turnover 0.2× liquidity.
Trading profile is proportionate (0.2× turnover).
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Pool is 1891h old.
Contract deployed 1891h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but the source is partially verified (bytecode-database match), so the code is readable.