We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 12d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILDangerous functions
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-18 under an older formula (v1.60). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 12d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000351
Liquidity
$29,952
Volume 24h
$5.93
FDV
$35,109
Buys 24h
2
1 sells
Age
109d 4h
Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: amm route change, custody redeem, fee change, initialization, address block, supply mint, asset rescue, a switch that can block transfers or selling, privileged code with assembly this audit could not read.
Sell execution could not be established on the other venues checked: At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so the token-wide result is unresolved.
On that scan, 5 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Top 10 holders hold 33.1% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 18.6%, because 43.7% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 6.5% of the float on its own.
Active owner key: .
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Could not read this pool's liquidity events, so custody was not attributed.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 61.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there. Its largest pool, (~$29952) (Uniswap), was not among the pools this scan assessed, so the shares above cover only the pools we read.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
This token was deployed by a contract, but that deployer is not in the launchpad registry, so its provenance could not be attributed.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
Deepest pool holds $29,952.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
Read at its implementation .
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
24h turnover 0.0× liquidity.
Trading profile is proportionate (0.0× turnover).
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Pool is 2316h old.
Contract deployed 2316h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.