DexProof recorded PAYGENT as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1409 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 13 passed, 5 warned, 2 failed and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
The largest liquidity provider, (a plain wallet), controls 91.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
The largest liquidity provider, (a plain wallet), controls 91.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment.
It is not the deployer. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 91.7% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Top 10 holders hold 93% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 74.5% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 33.5%. Liquidity pools hold 63.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The token contract has privileged powers (limit change, a switch that can block transfers or selling, privileged low-level code we couldn't read), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The code still contains these, but they can no longer be used: supply mint (initialize can only run once and already has), amm route change (initialize can only run once and already has), initialization (initialize can only run once and already has).
The same code has been deployed 15 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 22 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 22 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer.
The code matches, but the compiler metadata does not. This is about its implementation at .
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This contract was 50 days old at this scan.
Launched on Doppler.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood