DexProof recorded OZZY as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1509 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 2 warned and 9 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 36% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 4.3% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 17.8%. Liquidity pools hold 49.9% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 758 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 99.6% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (40236000 wei).
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 107 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood