DexProof recorded LPAD as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1260 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 3 warned and 6 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Scanned 3d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000168
Liquidity
$11,049
Volume 24h
$251.99
FDV
$16,252
Buys 24h
15
206 sells
Age
50d 4h
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 39% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 11.2% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 21.4%. Liquidity pools hold 44.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool is valued at $11,049, but only $4,074 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched. 0.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.0002 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (40196000 wei).
No liquidity removal by the wallet that launched this token from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it 167 times, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (an ad, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 47 days old at this scan.
This contract was 47 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood