DexProof recorded LEMON.FUN as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.63, in verdict #1228 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 4 warned and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
Scanned 3d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000076
Liquidity
$6,797
Volume 24h
$76.55
FDV
$7,488
Buys 24h
1
4 sells
Age
97d 10h
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. That result covers one pool only, so it does not show this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 45% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 8.9% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 14.6%. Liquidity pools hold 67.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $6,797.
The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 32 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Launched on Lemon.fun Launch Factory.
We don't track this launchpad's raises yet, so we don't know how much of the raise the creator bought. 2.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.0280 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (an ad, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 94 days old at this scan.
This contract was 94 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood