DexProof recorded JAMCAT as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1480 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 4 warned and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.000011
Liquidity
$8,726
Volume 24h
$1,179
FDV
$11,045
Buys 24h
17
11 sells
Age
80d 6h
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. That result covers one pool only, so it does not show this token can be sold everywhere.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 43% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 7.3% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 19.6%. Liquidity pools hold 54.0% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $8,726.
The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 14 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 8 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 8 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (an ad, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 78 days old at this scan.
This contract was 78 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into. 4.9% of the token supply was bought for 0.0700 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood