DexProof recorded INCEL as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1272 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 6 warned and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Scanned 3d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000728
Liquidity
$54,208
Volume 24h
$101.14
FDV
$71,633
Buys 24h
1
2 sells
Age
100d 14h
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
The token's main pool did not pass a sell test, so smaller pools that did pass can't show the token can be sold.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 36% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 5.4% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 17.4%. Liquidity pools hold 50.6% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. A further 0.3% of total supply is unsold and still sits on this token's own launch curve, waiting for buyers, so we leave it out of the tokens in circulation.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The token contract has privileged powers (limit change, a switch that can block transfers or selling, privileged low-level code we couldn't read), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The code still contains these, but they can no longer be used: supply mint (initialize can only run once and already has), amm route change (initialize can only run once and already has), initialization (initialize can only run once and already has).
The same code has been deployed 15 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 624 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We didn't trace where the creator's wallet got its funds, so we couldn't check for past rugs.
99.9% of the liquidity we could read is in a Uniswap V4 pool where its liquidity is locked, but a smaller pool has a problem.
We skipped this pool: it is one of 34 V4 pools for this token, outside the 6 with the most liquidity. We checked the pools that back the price instead. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We didn't trace where this deployer's money came from, so we can't say if it links to a known rugger.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The deepest pool holds $54,208.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer.
The code matches, but the compiler metadata does not. This is about its implementation at .
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's pool was 97 days old at this scan.
This contract was 97 days old at this scan.
Launched on Doppler.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood