We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNHolder concentration
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-23 under an older formula (v1.61). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0022
Liquidity
$133,413
Volume 24h
$30,370
FDV
$2.17M
Buys 24h
86
120 sells
Age
53d 2h
Sell execution could not be established on the other venues checked: Sell simulation coverage is incomplete; 54 candidate route(s) were not attempted, so a token-wide conclusion is unsupported.
On that scan, 4 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Top 10 holders hold 35.3% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 26.5%, because 16.7% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. A further 8.2% of total supply is held in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path, so it can never re-enter circulation and is excluded from the float. The single largest holder is , an address, holding 8.9% of the float. We could not check whether it holds these tokens for other people. We could not check whether some of the largest holders are staking or escrow contracts, so this share is reported at its highest supported reading.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
This token was created by a contract, which has no transactions of its own to read.
A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so no history is attributed to that address.
Could not read this pool's liquidity events, so custody was not attributed.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 62.9% of the liquidity this scan could read. 3 other pools for this token have liquidity one wallet could pull. We could not confirm who opened them.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Deepest pool holds $133,413.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
FDV is 16× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
24h turnover 0.2× liquidity.
Trading profile is proportionate (0.2× turnover).
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Pool is 1092h old.
Contract deployed 1092h ago.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
The trades on its curve were not recorded, so how much of the raise the creator bought is unknown.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.