DexProof recorded GAE as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.63, in verdict #1173 published 26 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 13 passed, 5 warned and 10 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Scanned 4d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
We couldn't get a clear result from any pool we tested, so we can't say whether this token can be sold.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The token contract has privileged powers (limit change, a switch that can block transfers or selling, privileged low-level code we couldn't read), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The code still contains these, but they can no longer be used: supply mint (initialize can only run once and already has), amm route change (initialize can only run once and already has), initialization (initialize can only run once and already has).
The same code has been deployed 15 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 296 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We didn't trace where the creator's wallet got its funds, so we couldn't check for past rugs.
We didn't trace where this deployer's money came from, so we can't say if it links to a known rugger.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is locked in the pool's own Doppler launch hook.
The launch's own state reads Locked, and in that state nothing can remove those curve positions.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer.
The code matches, but the compiler metadata does not. This is about its implementation at .
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This contract was 44 days old at this scan.
Launched on Doppler.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. We don't know how much of the raise the creator bought.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Almost all of the supply sits in pools or burn addresses, so we don't publish a concentration figure.
What is left in wallets is too small for one holder's share of it to mean anything.
Robinhood