We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 14d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-16 under an older formula (v1.60). Scan the token again for a current verdict.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 14d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 89.1% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 12.2%, because 86.3% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 30.8% of the float on its own.
Our sell test passed on the routes we measured, but that does not show whether the hook can stop a sale.
Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
On that scan, 8 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
551 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity were not checked.
A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Funding lineage
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its record is nobody's in particular.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so whatever sits in its history belongs to that source rather than to this deployer.
Could not read this pool's liquidity events, so custody was not attributed.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. 3 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We could not read this token's market data on this scan, so its pool depth was not measured.
This says what we could see, not what the token is.
Market data unavailable for FDV/liquidity ratio.
Market data unavailable for turnover.
Market data unavailable for wash-trade analysis.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Pool creation time unavailable.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
No risky serial-clone relationship found.
Contract deployed 1491h ago.
Launched on Party, a launchpad that deploys straight to a DEX pool rather than running a bonding curve.
There is no raise for the creator to have bought into, so this check has nothing to weigh against them. 4.0% of the token supply was bought by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.