Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILLP custody
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILLiquidity depth
DexProof recorded COCKIN as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1350 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 2 warned, 3 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000019
Liquidity
$939.31
Volume 24h
$17.62
FDV
$1,305
Buys 24h
10
1 sells
Age
—
This result is from the scan on 11 October 2026.
This scan could not read the pool's liquidity history yet, so we are keeping it until we can. None of this CL pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. The liquidity sits in a locker whose owner can take it back. Our review of this locker found a recovery function that only its owner can call. This pool is on Up CL and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Top 10 holders hold 79% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 25.1% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 36.5%. Liquidity pools hold 53.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $939, effectively nothing.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
We couldn't get a clear result from any pool we tested, so we can't say whether this token can be sold.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
Launched on Stonk Safe Launchpad.
We don't track this launchpad's raises yet, so we don't know how much of the raise the creator bought.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet that launched this token from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it 13 times, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a community takeover, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 71 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $939, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.