DexProof recorded BONER as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1297 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 12 passed, 6 warned, 2 failed and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 3d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 100.0% of the tokens in circulation on its own.
The token contract has privileged powers: address block, a switch that can block transfers or selling, upgrade code.
Someone can still use them, or we couldn't tell who controls them.
We couldn't test selling, because this token's 1 Uniswap V3 ETH pool holds no liquidity at the current price.
Nothing can trade through it, so a sell test there says nothing about the token.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This deployer is a new wallet funded by another new wallet, a common setup before a rug.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The code can be changed, but we found no admin address for it.
That does not prove the power to change it is gone. Another upgrade route may still be live.
This token's code matches 0x8936…74a1, a token whose market later collapsed.
That describes the market, not who caused it. We haven't verified that the same creator is behind both.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 930 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We couldn't find this token's pools, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
This is about its implementation at .
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This contract was 10 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood