DexProof recorded BANKROLL as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1349 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 2 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
The deployer (), a plain wallet, controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
The deployer (), a plain wallet, controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment.
Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V2 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Top 10 holders hold 92% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 41.5% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 23.0%. Liquidity pools hold 74.9% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
The token contract has privileged powers (amm route change, asset rescue, fee change, limit change, a switch that can block transfers or selling), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 22 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 22 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
1 hook-free pool is too small to matter and was set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Ownership was renounced.
The owner is the zero or dead address.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 104 days old at this scan.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood