Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNHolder concentration
DexProof recorded ASTEROID as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1650 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 5 warned and 6 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Price
$0.0000133
Liquidity
$14,423
Volume 24h
$146.77
FDV
$13,270
Buys 24h
4
2 sells
Age
101d 12h
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
We couldn't get a clear result from any pool we tested, so we can't say whether this token can be sold.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 37% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 6.8% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 16.9%. Liquidity pools hold 54.3% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The token contract has privileged powers (amm route change, fee change, supply mint, initialization, a switch that can block transfers or selling), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The same code has been deployed 3 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Deployer pulled liquidity, Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't read the creator's transactions. We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity.
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address is a contract too, not a person's wallet, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
100.0% of the liquidity we could read is in a Uniswap V2 pool where its liquidity is burned, but a smaller pool has a problem.
We skipped this pool: it is one of 8 V4 pools for this token, outside the 6 with the most liquidity. We checked the pools that back the price instead. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
Ownership was renounced.
The owner is the zero or dead address.
The deepest pool holds $14,423.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This is about its implementation at .
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's pool was 101 days old at this scan.
This contract was 101 days old at this scan.
Launched on flap.sh.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.