We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 45d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILImpersonation
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNChecks with missing data
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-09-15 under an older formula (v1.51). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 45d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000004
Liquidity
$3,578
Volume 24h
$334.62
FDV
$3,911
Buys 24h
2
5 sells
Age
65d 0h
Ticker collision: this token takes the name and symbol of a real tokenized share but is not it — it has its own code and no tokenized-share infrastructure.
The real PLTR (Palantir) is .
Top 10 holders hold 58.6% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 16.7%, because 71.5% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 14.3% of the float on its own.
On that scan, 4 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked.
The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its controller or contract logic may still transfer or withdraw it; contract audit is required before making a stronger claim. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.2% of the liquidity this scan could read.
Deepest pool is valued at $3,578, but only $819 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Removal logs were read on 20 of this token's pools but not on 1 (tx-sender-resolution:22-transactions-unchecked), so a deployer pull on those cannot be ruled out.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
The deployer's transaction history came back empty, so fee or limit changes could not be checked.
This token was deployed by a contract, but that deployer is not in the launchpad registry, so its provenance could not be attributed.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Sell quotes through the pool and its swap hook , and a full round trip recovers 96.0% of the probe: exitable.
A fresh wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer.
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
24h turnover 0.1× liquidity.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
No risky serial-clone relationship found.
Pool is 478h old.
Contract deployed 478h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Pool too shallow ($3578) for turnover analysis to be meaningful.