DexProof recorded SETTRIX as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1146 published 25 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 15 passed, 3 warned, 1 failed and 9 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 52.1% of the circulating float.
Scanned 6d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 52.1% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 27.2%, because 1.1% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. A further 46.7% of total supply is unsold and still sits on this token's own launch curve, waiting for buyers, so it is excluded from the float. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 7.2% of the float on its own.
Sell execution could not be established on the other venues checked: The token's main pool did not pass a sell test, so smaller pools that did cannot clear the token.
Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
On that scan, 8 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Contract deployed 8.7h ago.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Funding lineage
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its record is nobody's in particular.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so whatever sits in its history belongs to that source rather than to this deployer.
This pool has no active liquidity, and its hook holds none of the token or the paired asset.
2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there. (This token trades in 3 pools, and their relative sizes could not be measured on this scan, so the pool named here may not be the token's main market. The full pool list is in the evidence.)
We could not read this token's market data on this scan, so its pool depth was not measured.
This says what we could see, not what the token is.
Market data unavailable for FDV/liquidity ratio.
Market data unavailable for turnover.
Market data unavailable for wash-trade analysis.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Pool creation time unavailable.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs a hook that can change what a trade pays out, and we have not established a limit on it.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Launched on Pons V2; still on the bonding curve (4.4% to graduation), so liquidity is custodied by the launchpad contract until graduation.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Robinhood