DexProof recorded PEPONS as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1500 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 3 warned, 1 failed and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 51% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000051
Liquidity
$4,856
Volume 24h
$0.0400
FDV
$5,064
Buys 24h
4
1 sells
Age
100d 21h
Top 10 holders hold 51% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 15.6% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 10.6%. Liquidity pools hold 79.3% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-09-18, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
The deepest pool is valued at $4,856, but only $840 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 137 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 3 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (40672000 wei).
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 99 days old at this scan.
This contract was 99 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into. 4.2% of the token supply was bought for 0.0600 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $4,856, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.
Robinhood