We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNHolder concentration
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-23 under an older formula (v1.61). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000535
Liquidity
$39,831
Volume 24h
$1,781
FDV
$53,307
Buys 24h
37
198 sells
Age
104d 7h
Sell execution could not be established on the other venues checked: Sell simulation coverage is incomplete; 3 candidate route(s) were not attempted, so a token-wide conclusion is unsupported.
On that scan, 3 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Top 10 holders hold 35.5% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 22.3%, because 37.2% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , an address, holding 6.0% of the float. We could not check whether it holds these tokens for other people. We could not check whether some of the largest holders are staking or escrow contracts, so this share is reported at its highest supported reading.
Privileged capabilities present (amm route change, fee change, supply mint, initialization, a switch that can block transfers or selling) but every controlling authority is renounced or unreachable.
The same contract template has been deployed 3 times, a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Funding lineage
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its record is nobody's in particular.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so whatever sits in its history belongs to that source rather than to this deployer.
99.8% of the liquidity this scan could read is in a Uniswap V2 pool where its liquidity is burned.
Separately: Not counted: one of 15 V4 fee-tier pools for this token, outside the top 6 by active liquidity. The pools backing the price were assessed instead. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Ownership renounced (owner is the zero/dead address).
Deepest pool holds $39,831.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
Read at its implementation .
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
24h turnover 0.0× liquidity.
Trading profile is proportionate (0.0× turnover).
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Pool is 2321h old.
Contract deployed 2371h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Launched on flap.sh, but its bonding curve stalled without graduating, so no DEX pool ever existed and there is nothing further for this check to say.