Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNHolder concentration
DexProof recorded AUREON as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1666 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 5 warned and 4 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Price
$0.0000378
Liquidity
$32,308
Volume 24h
$145.11
FDV
$37,733
Buys 24h
32
142 sells
Age
104d 11h
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 38% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 6.5% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 22.0%. Liquidity pools hold 42.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The token contract has privileged powers (amm route change, fee change, supply mint, initialization, a switch that can block transfers or selling), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The same code has been deployed 3 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 8 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
99.8% of the liquidity we could read is in a Uniswap V2 pool where its liquidity is burned, but a smaller pool has a problem.
We skipped this pool: it is one of 15 V4 pools for this token, outside the 6 with the most liquidity. We checked the pools that back the price instead. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 8 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Ownership was renounced.
The owner is the zero or dead address.
The deepest pool holds $32,308.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This is about its implementation at .
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's pool was 104 days old at this scan.
This contract was 106 days old at this scan.
Launched on flap.sh.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.