Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded PCC as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1646 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 20 passed, 2 warned and 6 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
Price
$0.0011
Liquidity
$110,873
Volume 24h
$18,371
FDV
$1.05M
Buys 24h
45
46 sells
Age
66d 20h
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. That result covers one pool only, so it does not show this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 99.8% of the liquidity we could read.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched. 2.1% of the token supply was bought for 0.0300 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet that launched this token from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it 916 times, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
Top 10 holders hold 17% of the tokens in circulation.
Against total supply, the top 10 hold 15.7%. Liquidity pools hold 6.2% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
The deepest pool holds $110,873.
The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 9× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.2× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.2× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 67 days old at this scan.
This contract was 67 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.