DexProof recorded STAMP as CRITICAL on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1440 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 4 warned, 2 failed and 3 could not be run.
Don't trade this token.
This token's creator removed liquidity from this token's pool.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0003
Liquidity
$538.69
Volume 24h
$41.43
FDV
$985.00
Buys 24h
1
45 sells
Age
20d 13h
This token's creator removed liquidity from this token's pool.
It made 2 withdrawals on Uniswap V4, and each one closed the position completely.
The deepest pool holds $539, effectively nothing.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 48% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 9.9% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 16.9%. Liquidity pools hold 64.8% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The token contract has privileged powers (supply mint), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 92.6% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Ownership was renounced.
The owner is the zero or dead address.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 2× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 18 days old at this scan.
This contract was 18 days old at this scan.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $539, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.
Robinhood