DexProof recorded NOCKAI as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1579 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 22 passed, 3 warned and 3 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000117
Liquidity
$9,639
Volume 24h
$1,284
FDV
$11,638
Buys 24h
6
6 sells
Age
18d 19h
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 45% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 8.2% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 22.3%. Liquidity pools hold 41.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. A further 8.2% of total supply is in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path. It can never re-enter circulation, so we leave it out of the tokens in circulation.
The deepest pool holds $9,639.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 4 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
2 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out. A new wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes. A price quote alone can't test that.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 17 days old at this scan.
This contract was 19 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood