DexProof recorded RHhooder as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1506 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 3 warned, 1 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
The token contract has privileged powers: fee change, initialization, limit change, asset rescue, address block, a switch that can block transfers or selling, custody redeem, supply mint.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000094
Liquidity
$8,650
Volume 24h
$301.96
FDV
$9,392
Buys 24h
3
2 sells
Age
17d 19h
The token contract has privileged powers: fee change, initialization, limit change, asset rescue, address block, a switch that can block transfers or selling, custody redeem, supply mint.
Someone can still use them, or we couldn't tell who controls them.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 36% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 5.4% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 19.1%. Liquidity pools hold 47.5% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $8,650.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
96.9% of the liquidity we could read is in a Uniswap V2 pool where its liquidity is burned, but a smaller pool has a problem.
We skipped this pool: it is one of 12 V4 pools for this token, outside the 6 with the most liquidity. We checked the pools that back the price instead. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
The contract has no owner function, but we can't confirm nobody controls it.
Our contract audit could not tell who holds control over it.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
5 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out.
No liquidity removal by the wallet that launched this token from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it 2 times, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This is about its implementation at .
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 16 days old at this scan.
This contract was 16 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood