Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 97.7% of the circulating float.
Scanned 5d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded AVAL as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1155 published 25 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 1 warned, 1 failed and 10 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 97.7% of the circulating float.
Scanned 5d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 97.7% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 2.7%, because 97.2% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a contract, holding 42.7% of the float on its own.
On that scan, 9 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
We could not read this token's market data on this scan, so its pool depth was not measured.
This says what we could see, not what the token is.
Market data unavailable for FDV/liquidity ratio.
Market data unavailable for turnover.
Market data unavailable for wash-trade analysis.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Pool creation time unavailable.
Launched on UERC20 Token Factory.
We do not track that launchpad's raises yet, so how much of the raise the creator bought was not measured. The pool's creation transaction could not be fully read this scan, so its launch buys are unknown.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that the Universal Router itself will execute it. A fresh wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
LP locked: 100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is held by Uniswap v4 FeeSplitter, a trusted locker contract, and its audited code has no function that can withdraw a position.
This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode rather than proven against this one.
The token contract has no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in its bytecode.
This contract also has 4 functions we could not identify (0x02d05d3f, 0x392f37e9, 0x3c130d90, 0xf56a499f). You may want to look at them. Every one of them is named in the contract's own published source.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Contract deployed 1836h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but the source is partially verified (bytecode-database match), so the code is readable.