Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 77% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILLiquidity depth
- FAILLaunchpad provenance
DexProof recorded HI as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1442 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 4 warned, 3 failed and 4 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 77% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000024
Liquidity
$2,414
Volume 24h
$0.0300
FDV
$2,414
Buys 24h
2
1 sells
Age
26d 15h
Top 10 holders hold 77% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 32.8% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 0.8%. Liquidity pools hold 98.9% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool is valued at $2,414, but only $27 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. That leaves effectively nothing for sellers to cash out into. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
92.7% of the token supply was bought for 12.7000 ETH by 13 wallets in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
A test sale worked on the main Uniswap V3 pool but failed on uniswap-v4.
The results conflict, so we can't say whether this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-10-05, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This token's code matches an earlier creator liquidity removal on 0x05e6…a383.
We haven't verified that the same creator is behind both.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 12 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's pool was 24 days old at this scan.
This contract was 24 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
This token's pool holds only $2,414, too shallow for a turnover check to mean anything.