Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 52% of the tokens in circulation.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNChecks with missing data
- WARNContract ownership
DexProof recorded ROCK as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1667 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 18 passed, 4 warned, 1 failed and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 52% of the tokens in circulation.
Price
$0.0000317
Liquidity
$32,454
Volume 24h
$0.0700
FDV
$31,581
Buys 24h
2
1 sells
Age
60d 2h
Top 10 holders hold 52% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 10.3% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 10.3%. Liquidity pools hold 80.1% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This contract still has an active owner: .
The token contract has privileged powers (limit change, a switch that can block transfers or selling, privileged low-level code we couldn't read), but whoever controlled them gave up control or can no longer use them.
The code still contains these, but they can no longer be used: supply mint (initialize can only run once and already has), amm route change (initialize can only run once and already has), initialization (initialize can only run once and already has).
The same code has been deployed 15 times, which looks like a copycat pattern.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 27 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
The creator's wallet was funded by , a shared source that has sent starting funds to 5 different wallets.
A shared source such as an exchange funds many unrelated people, so its record does not name any one of them.
99.9% of the liquidity we could read is in a Uniswap V4 pool where its liquidity is locked, but a smaller pool has a problem.
We skipped this pool: it is one of 31 V4 pools for this token, outside the 6 with the most liquidity. We checked the pools that back the price instead. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer was funded by , a wallet that has sent starting funds to 5 different wallets.
That is a shared source such as an exchange, so its history says nothing about this deployer.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
5 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out. A new wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes. A price quote alone can't test that.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The deepest pool is valued at $32,454, but only $7,203 of that is GLD, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer.
The code matches, but the compiler metadata does not. This is about its implementation at .
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.0× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's pool was 60 days old at this scan.
This contract was 60 days old at this scan.
Launched on Doppler.
Our launchpad records don't show it graduating, but it has a DEX pool. The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.