DexProof recorded RUVO as DANGER on Robinhood Chain under formula v1.61, in verdict #1166 published 26 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 12 passed, 7 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
High risk. Only trade what you can afford to lose.
Top 10 holders hold 63.4% of the circulating float.
Scanned 4d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000041
Liquidity
$4,345
Volume 24h
$121,696
FDV
$3,892
Buys 24h
1,217
1,061 sells
Age
4d 9h
Top 10 holders hold 63.4% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 21.5%, because 57.9% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. A further 8.2% of total supply is held in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path, so it can never re-enter circulation and is excluded from the float. The single largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 15.5% of the float on its own.
Unverified contract source.
On that scan, 5 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked.
The largest liquidity provider is , a plain wallet, and not the deployer. It controls 100.0% of this pool's liquidity and can withdraw it at any moment. Renouncing ownership does not protect against this. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Deepest pool holds $4,345.
24h volume is 28× liquidity.
Pool is 3.2h old, under the 48h line.
Contract deployed 4.5h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN and source unverified: the bytecode is opaque.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage
Many people launch through the same contract, so rugs among the tokens it made are not one launcher's record. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Many people launch through the same contract, so its launch history is nobody's in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
Money paid into a contract like that is nobody's funding history in particular. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so no history is attributed to that address.
No owner() function, and the contract's source is unverified, so its authority surface could not be enumerated and ownerlessness is not established.
This contract has 7 functions we could not identify (0x536dac9b, 0x53cd512a, 0x7165485d, 0x7284e416, and 3 more), and it has published no source that names them.
We cannot say whether any of them can mint, pause, blacklist or limit this token.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
1 hook-free pool is too small to matter and was set aside. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that the Universal Router itself will execute it. A fresh wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes, which the V4 Quoter alone cannot exercise.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Bytecode did not match any known clone template.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
Creator bought 0% of the raise.
Pool too shallow ($4345) for turnover analysis to be meaningful.
Robinhood