DexProof recorded Felis as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1478 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 2 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 38.4% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 0.3%. Liquidity pools hold 99.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
This exact code was used by 32 other tokens, and 31 of them lost most of their value or had their liquidity removed.
They include 0xde19…5ee5, 0xa918…3f22, 0x0c75…4202. That describes those tokens, and it does not say who created this one.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This deployer is a new wallet funded by another new wallet, a common setup before a rug.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (42452000 wei).
No liquidity removal by this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in the token contract's code.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This contract was 34 days old at this scan.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood