Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 15 October 2026.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILLP custody
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNPrior pump-and-dump mark
DexProof recorded karure as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1441 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 16 passed, 3 warned, 2 failed and 7 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 15 October 2026.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
This result is from the scan on 15 October 2026.
This scan could not read the pool's liquidity history yet, so we are keeping it until we can. None of this V3 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its code is not published, so nothing shows what it can do with this liquidity, and it is controlled by the wallet . This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
Top 10 holders hold 98% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 86.0% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 1.3%. Liquidity pools hold 98.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
This token crashed after launch.
On 2026-09-21, its price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second data source confirmed it. This often happens when early buyers sell. On its own it does not mean the contract or its liquidity is unsafe.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
This token's code matches an earlier confirmed rug on 0x01ae…12e6.
We haven't verified that the same creator is behind both.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (41308000 wei).
No liquidity removal by this token's creator from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it once, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This contract was 37 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.