DexProof recorded HOODCAT as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1554 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 20 passed, 1 warned, 2 failed and 5 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
The largest liquidity provider, (a contract), holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000275
Liquidity
$14,286
Volume 24h
$2,951
FDV
$27,507
Buys 24h
25
15 sells
Age
57d 16h
The largest liquidity provider, (a contract), holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity.
It is not the deployer. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its code was audited: `upgradeToAndCall(address,bytes)`, which can move that liquidity, and it has a ownable controller, . We could not confirm that this controller gates that function, so this is a path that may be open, not a pull that can happen right now. None of this V4 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.3% of the liquidity we could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
A contract deployed this token, but that contract is not in the launchpad registry.
So we can't tell where it launched. 26.1% of the token supply was bought by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
Top 10 holders hold 42% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 6.2% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 27.0%. Liquidity pools hold 35.0% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We didn't check 27 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
6 hook-free pools are too small to matter and were set aside. 1 more pool is too small to matter and was not tested. This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that Uniswap's own router will carry it out. A new wallet can also send this token to the pool, the transfer a sell actually makes. A price quote alone can't test that.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan.
The missing data is small enough that it does not limit the verdict.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
The deepest pool holds $14,286.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 2× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs a hook that can change what a trade pays out, and we have not established a limit on it.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 0.2× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 0.2× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a community takeover, a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 56 days old at this scan.
This contract was 56 days old at this scan.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood