High risk. Only trade what you can afford to lose.
Trading looks like wash trading: volume is 21× the pool's liquidity, from only 8 traders.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILWash trading
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded OUROBOROS as DANGER on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1558 published 29 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 19 passed, 5 warned, 1 failed and 3 could not be run.
High risk. Only trade what you can afford to lose.
Trading looks like wash trading: volume is 21× the pool's liquidity, from only 8 traders.
Scanned 1d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0111
Liquidity
$8,220
Volume 24h
$175,779
FDV
$10,222
Buys 24h
29
21 sells
Age
59d 1h
Trading looks like wash trading: volume is 21× the pool's liquidity, from only 8 traders.
Up to 7.3 trades per wallet on one side.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
21 pools were not tested, so we can't say selling is blocked on every pool. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 43% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 8.5% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 20.1%. Liquidity pools hold 53.5% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
The deepest pool holds $8,220.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 21× the pool's liquidity.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't work out which wallet funded the creator, so there was no funder to check for past rugs.
This pool's own hook holds 100.0% of its liquidity.
We counted that share, but it is not a wallet, a burn or a trusted locker, so we can't say who controls the rest. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 98.8% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We couldn't find the wallet that first funded this deployer, so we have no funding trail to check.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer.
This token's value at full supply is 1× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs a hook that can change what a trade pays out, and we have not established a limit on it.
We saw no fee or limit changes by the deployer in the transactions we searched.
We only looked at the deployer's recent history, so changes by a separate fee owner would not show.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This token's pool was 58 days old at this scan.
This contract was 58 days old at this scan.
No launchpad deployed this token.
It was deployed directly, which counts neither for nor against it. The on-chain checks decide this one.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.