Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 73% of the tokens in circulation.
- FAILHolder concentration
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNChecks with missing data
DexProof recorded RTR as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1637 published 30 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 14 passed, 2 warned, 1 failed and 11 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
Top 10 holders hold 73% of the tokens in circulation.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 73% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 57.0% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 3.7%. Liquidity pools hold 94.9% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
We couldn't get a clear result from any pool we tested, so we can't say whether this token can be sold. That result covers one pool only, so it does not show this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We can't rule out that the creator pulled liquidity from this token's pool.
We only read the creator's most recent transactions. We didn't check 503 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 884 tokens for many different people, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 884 tokens for many different people, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The launchpad's own record names , but that address has launched 884 tokens for many different people, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 98 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into. 0.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.0001 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.