Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
- WARNHoneypot
- WARNHolder concentration
- WARNPaid promotion
DexProof recorded LMNI as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1853 published 4 Nov 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 20 passed, 5 warned and 3 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
Price
$0.0000756
Liquidity
$24,367
Volume 24h
$99,668
FDV
$70,693
Buys 24h
937
636 sells
Age
5h 53m
We couldn't finish the sell test on the other exchanges we checked.
At least one pool did not pass its sell test and could not be shown too small to matter, so we can't say this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
Top 10 holders hold 32% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 6.0% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 21.8%. Liquidity pools hold 22.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades. A further 8.2% of total supply is in a permanent launchpad locker with no withdrawal path. It can never re-enter circulation, so we leave it out of the tokens in circulation.
Someone is paying for visibility: 30 active paid DexScreener boosts.
Organic demand doesn't need to pay for it.
This token's pool was only 2.8 hours old at this scan, under our 48 hour line.
This contract was only 3.9 hours old at this scan.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't tell who funded the creator's wallet.
The funding contract, or the wallet behind it, could not be identified, so its history is unknown.
We couldn't identify the contract that funded this deployer or who sent it, so we can't say which wallets are linked to them.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan.
The missing data is small enough that it does not limit the verdict.
100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is locked in Launchpad V2 Launch Locker, a trusted locker contract.
The lock is permanent, so that liquidity can never be withdrawn. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 99.4% of the liquidity we could read. 3 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
The deepest pool holds $24,367.
All of this depth arrived in the 24 hours before this scan.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
This token's value at full supply is 3× its pool liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code. This is about the token contract only. Its main pool runs the Pons V2 Meme Hook, which can take up to 10% of each trade.
Trading volume over 24 hours is 4.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Volume is 4.1× the pool's liquidity, below our warning level.
Our market data had no trader counts, so we could not check for wallets trading back and forth.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
Launched on Pons V2 and graduated to a DEX pool.
The raise on record is too old to compare against, so how much of it the creator bought is unknown. We couldn't fully read the transaction that opened this token's pool, so we don't know who bought at launch.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.