DexProof recorded POD as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1421 published 28 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 17 passed, 3 warned and 8 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
A test sale worked on the Uniswap V3 pool, but we couldn't finish testing another pool.
2 pools were not tested, so we can't say this token can be sold on every pool. That result covers one pool only, so it does not show this token can be sold everywhere. Sells on this pool go through a swap hook we could not verify. Our code check found no owner-set sell controls, but that does not show what the hook does to a sale.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity on this scan.
Missing data limits the verdict. A pool we couldn't read is not a pool we cleared. This describes what we could see, not the token.
Top 10 holders hold 45% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a plain wallet, holding 8.4% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 9.9%. Liquidity pools hold 78.1% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
We couldn't read this pool's liquidity history, so we couldn't check who holds its liquidity.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity we could read.
We found no active rug markers in the funding records we checked, but we couldn't trace every wallet linked to this deployer.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
A contract created this token, so we can't see the person behind it.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
No liquidity removal by the wallet recorded as this token's creator from its own pool.
Other wallets removed liquidity from it 245 times, so this does not mean the pool is intact. The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded the creator, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is verified on the explorer, but it was matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no privileged powers in the token contract's code.
We looked at its audited source and compiled code.
No active paid boosts.
DexScreener has paid listing services on record for this token (a token profile), which is common for a launched token.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 83 days old at this scan.
Launched on Pons, which puts tokens straight into an exchange pool and runs no bonding curve.
So there was no raise for the creator to buy into. 5.0% of the token supply was bought for 0.0721 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
The source is verified, so anyone can read the code.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood