We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 13d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILPrior pump-and-dump mark
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILLiquidity depth
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-17 under an older formula (v1.60). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 13d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
$0.0000026
Liquidity
$2,858
Volume 24h
$2.79M
FDV
$2,589
Buys 24h
4,507
6,041 sells
Age
16d 1h
Marked on 2026-10-16: the price or liquidity fell 95% or more below its 72-hour peak, and a second market source confirmed it. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Top 10 holders hold 98.6% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 3.4%, because 96.6% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , an address, holding 20.6% of the float on behalf of holders this scan could not enumerate, so that share is not proven to be under one key. Some of this supply is held inside a staking or escrow contract whose depositors could only be partly identified, so this share is reported at its highest supported reading.
Deepest pool is valued at $2,858, but only $357 of that is WETH, the side a seller receives.
The rest is this token's own supply. That is effectively no exit liquidity. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
24h volume is 975× liquidity, a wash-trade signature.
This exact contract code has been used by 13 other tokens, and 13 of them lost most of their value or had their liquidity removed (0x324d…3545, 0x39aa…5598, 0x9465…d56a).
That describes those tokens. It does not say who created this one.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but this scanner does not have that launchpad's launch model on record, so whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into is unknown.
93.8% of the token supply was bought for 15.2000 ETH by 11 wallets in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
The V3 pool's sell test passed, but another route's test was not conclusive.
No simulated route could be definitively classified; the token-wide result is unresolved. The V3 result covers that pool only, so it does not show the token can be sold on every route.
On that scan, 2 checks had missing or incomplete data.
We couldn't work out who controls this token's liquidity. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
31 transactions by the creator that could remove liquidity were not checked.
A pull by the creator cannot be ruled out.
Could not read this pool's liquidity events, so custody was not attributed.
This pool is on Uniswap V3 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. One other pool charges a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
No active rug markers were found in the funding records checked, but untraced wallet connections remain unknown.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded this deployer, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
The funds were sent through a batch-send contract.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
No owner() function.
No single owner key surface.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer, but matched from another address with identical bytecode (a shared bytecode database) rather than proven against this one.
FDV is 1× liquidity, a proportionate ratio.
The token contract has no privileged capabilities found in the audited source and bytecode.
No fee or limit toggling by the deployer in the transactions searched.
This looks at the deployer's recent history only, so calls by a separate fee authority are out of its reach.
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Pool is 54h old.
Contract deployed 54h ago.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.
Pool too shallow ($2858) for turnover analysis to be meaningful.