DexProof recorded VIBECAT as CAUTION on Robinhood Chain under formula v2.0.1, in verdict #1322 published 27 Oct 2026 (UTC). Of 28 checks, 15 passed, 1 warned, 3 failed and 9 could not be run.
Trade with care. Read the warnings first.
This result is from the scan on 16 October 2026.
Scanned 2d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
This result is from the scan on 16 October 2026.
This scan could not read the pool's liquidity history yet, so we are keeping it until we can. None of this V3 pool's liquidity is burned or locked. The largest liquidity provider is , a contract, and not the deployer. It holds 100.0% of this pool's liquidity. This contract is not a trusted locker, so this liquidity is not considered locked. Its code was audited: `upgradeToAndCall(address,bytes)`, which can move that liquidity, and it has a ownable controller, . We could not establish that this controller is the one gating that function, so treat this as a path that may be open rather than a pull that can happen right now.
Top 10 holders hold 100% of the tokens in circulation.
The largest holder is , a contract, holding 82.3% of the tokens in circulation on its own. Against total supply, the top 10 hold 0.3%. Liquidity pools hold 99.7% of total supply, and we leave them out of the tokens in circulation. The top 10 share also moves when pool liquidity moves, even if no holder trades.
Launched on an unregistered launchpad, but we don't know how that launchpad works, so we can't say whether there was a raise for the creator to buy into.
71.9% of the token supply was bought for 3.5000 ETH by 1 wallet in the transaction that opened its pool, before outside buyers could trade.
We couldn't read some checks on this scan, so the verdict is limited.
A failed read is not a clean result. This describes what we could see, not the token.
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
Applies to: Funder rug history, Deployer launch history, Funding lineage, Tax manipulation
So we can't check for past rugs, because many people launch through it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check its past launches. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't trace who funded it. The transaction that created it was sent by , but a transaction sender can be the pad's own relayer rather than the launcher, so we don't attribute any history to that address.
So we can't check whether it changed fees or limits.
We could not read this token's market data, so we did not measure its pool depth.
That is a gap in what we could see, not a finding about the token. The opening token deposit into pool contained no ETH. Its opening ETH came from buyers.
We don't have the market data needed to compare this token's value at full supply with its liquidity.
We don't have the volume and liquidity figures needed to check turnover.
We don't have the market data needed to check for wash trading.
We could not find when this token's pool was created.
This token does not share its name and symbol with any real tokenized share.
The explorer has not tagged this contract as a scam.
A test sale worked from two separate new wallets.
A test buy worked too. We ran it at this chain's live gas price (40172000 wei).
No liquidity removal by the wallet that launched this token from its own pool.
The creator's recent history has no removal calls either.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
This token has no honeypot mark in our records.
This token has no pump-and-dump mark in our records.
The contract has no owner function, so it has no single owner wallet.
This contract's code is fixed.
We found no standard upgrade setup on it.
This contract's source is partially verified on the explorer, matched from another address with identical bytecode, not proven against this one.
We found no mint, pause, blacklist or limit functions in the token contract's code.
It also has 21 functions we couldn't identify (0x0861ac61, 0x089fe6aa, 0x12f16a07, 0x3de35b79, and 17 more). You may want to look at them. The contract's own published source names every one of them.
No paid promotion found on DexScreener.
This token's code doesn't match any code template we know of.
This contract was 24 days old at this scan.
The source is partially verified through a bytecode match, so the code can be read.
We could not match it to a known template.
Robinhood