We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
- FAILHolder concentration
- FAILDangerous functions
- WARNChecks with missing data
No current verdict. The last complete check is from 2026-10-23 under an older formula (v1.61). A new check is underway.
We couldn't finish this scan. Scan again before you trade.
No current verdict.
Scanned 7d ago. Scan again before you trade.
Price
—
Liquidity
—
Volume 24h
—
FDV
—
Buys 24h
—
Age
—
Top 10 holders hold 99.8% of the circulating float.
On raw total supply that's 1.4%, because 98.6% of total supply sits in liquidity pools and is excluded from the float. The float figure is measured against supply outside the pools, so it also moves when pool liquidity moves. The single largest holder is , a smart-account wallet, holding 48.9% of the float on its own.
Privileged capabilities present and reachable via a live or unresolved authority: fee change, supply mint, initialization.
On that scan, 8 checks had missing or incomplete data. (Shortened from the original receipt.)
Contract bytecode matches prior active honeypot mark on 0xbcfc…4acc, sharing the same recorded deployer address (0x5bd1…4661); operator link is unverified (shared factory or relayer may match).
These are gaps in what we could see, not problems found in this token.
The token's main pool and every other pool large enough to matter let it be sold in our test.
This does not show how large a sale those pools can absorb, or that the Universal Router itself will execute it. But the V4 Quoter does not settle token balances, and the token's own transfer layer could not be probed (could not locate the balances storage slot (non-standard layout), so no transfer could be simulated) — so nothing here exercised the layer where a sell is actually blocked, and no exit conclusion is drawn.
No active rug markers were found in the funding records checked, but untraced wallet connections remain unknown.
No owner() function, but the contract audit could not attribute the contract's authority surface, so ownerlessness is not established.
We could not read this token's market data on this scan, so its pool depth was not measured.
This says what we could see, not what the token is.
Market data unavailable for FDV/liquidity ratio.
Market data unavailable for turnover.
Market data unavailable for wash-trade analysis.
This token was created by a contract, which sends no transactions of its own, so fee or limit changes by its creator could not be checked.
Pool creation time unavailable.
No canonical asset collision.
No scam tag on the explorer.
No liquidity removal by this token's creator or the wallet that launched it from its own pool.
None in the creator's recent history either.
Nothing on record ties , the wallet that funded this deployer, to a past rug on Robinhood Chain.
This token is not on our list of confirmed rugs.
No prior honeypot on record.
No pump-and-dump on record.
LP locked: 100.0% of this V4 pool's liquidity is held by positions under the pool's own launch hook, and that hook rejects every attempt to remove liquidity.
The hook cannot be upgraded, so this liquidity can never be withdrawn. This pool is on Uniswap V4 and holds 100.0% of the liquidity this scan could read. 2 other pools charge a fee too large to trade through, so nothing a holder owns is at risk there.
This deployer has no earlier launches on record.
Not an upgradeable proxy.
The code is fixed.
Contract source is verified on the explorer.
Read at its implementation .
No active paid boosts on DexScreener.
The paid-order list could not be read this scan, so purchased listings are not covered by this result.
Contract deployed 1786h ago.
Launched on letscash.fun, a launchpad that deploys straight to a DEX pool rather than running a bonding curve.
There is no raise for the creator to have bought into, so this check has nothing to weigh against them.
Fingerprint UNKNOWN, but source is verified, so the code is readable by anyone.